Latest Articles

No-one who has been following British politics over the last few years can deny that public discourse around leaving the EU has been dominated by immigration. From the start of the process until today, the influx of European nationals into this country was front on centre of political arguments from all sides.

When David Cameron went to Brussels to renegotiate British EU membership in 2016, an ‘emergency break’ limiting access to the welfare state for Europeans was among the concessions achieved. This was to address ‘concerns’ over the number of immigrants from Eastern Europe who came to the UK since free movement was extended to these countries, and their perceived dependency on benefits.

One of the most popular and attention-grabbing pledges during the referendum campaign itself was made by Boris Johnson, who stated that Turkish immigration to the UK will skyrocket as the country would eventually join the EU - despite the fact that Turkish EU membership does not look likely anytime soon.

Since becoming Prime Minister, Theresa May made it clear that she interprets the vote to leave as a mandate to reduce immigration and strengthen the UK border first and foremost. This culminated in the publication of the Immigration White Paper just before Christmas, setting out a new policy approach which will see the end of free movement, implementing a new skills-based immigration system, alongside commitments to Fortress Europe and the hostile environment. To stop freedom of movement remains a ‘red line’ for the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Deal negotiations, despite her failure to date to secure an agreement that will be supported by the House of Commons.

But the Conservative party is not the only advocate for the end of free movement. Whilst open borders used to be a common demand in left wing circles, since coming to power within the Labour Party, radical voices in the movement have conceded to triangulation on the immigration question and have come out in opposition to free movement.

In 2017, Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party ran on a manifesto which promised to end free movement - and even more significantly, introduced a segment of the hostile environment, no recourse to public funds for immigrants - into its policy.

Some believe this move is necessary because ending freedom of movement is a vital part of fulfilling the promise of the referendum. The Brexit vote is being interpreted as a protest from working class Labour voters, particularly in the de-industrialised areas of the North of England, expressing their opposition to globalisation and the impact of high levels of immigration on wages. To not deliver on this promise would be undemocratic and a betrayal of core Labour voters in our heartlands.

For others, freedom of movement represents a form of privilege, which advantages European migrants over others from the Global South seeking to come to Britain in search of a better life away from the instability and poverty in their region. Lexiteers believe that an immigration system that advantages those from the Global South over immigration from European countries will help address inequalities that are consequences of the exploitation and oppression inflicted by imperial powers such as the British Empire. The Global North has a responsibility to make up for its past sins by allowing those who live in the conditions imperialism created to come to Europe as an attempt to rebalance this historic injustice.

Whilst many studies on the impact of immigration on the labour market have debunked the myth of its significant impact on jobs and wage growth, undeniably exploitative bosses who do not pay their migrant staff the appropriate wages do exist. The solution to this is not to shut out migrant workers but to build class solidarity between migrant and native workers by organising them together in Trade Unions. Only if the working class stands shoulder to shoulder against capitalist oppression, not divided along the arbitrary lines of nationhood, can workers win their struggles for fair pay and conditions.

Whilst the Lexiteers approach to immigration appears noble at first, it seems like little work has been done to challenge the narrative of the ‘undeserving and poor immigrant’ either in the wider discourse in society, nor in the labour movement. Given that a large part of Labour’s immigration policy and response to the Government’s White Paper centred around committing to and the endorsement of a skills based approach, the left has little to no political capital to advocate for low-skilled workers from less advanced and culturally ‘less similar’ countries to move to Britain more freely.

It is too simplistic to analyse the Brexit vote in working class Labour areas purely as a revolt against a globalised economy. To deny the cultural element - a fear of the other, of cultures that are seen too different from our own - is too convenient for a left that seeks to focus mainly on material conditions. The left needs to make a strong case for an open, diverse and pluralist society, and abandon the distinction between those who contribute to the needs of British capital and those who don’t to create the political power needed to implement a policy which gives open access to the country to working class people from across the world.

Abandoning freedom of movement as a principle will do little to aid this goal. Instead, the Labour movement should rally in defence of migration as a human right - and start addressing the fact that a large part of British society feels uncomfortable with changing communities.

Uniting all working people behind a common struggle is just the starting point. At the same time the labour movement must fight for stronger communities to combat alienation and foster a renewed sense of belonging. This must be combined with strong anti-racist politics and education to challenge institutionalised prejudice against foreigners and minorities.

Rather than abandoning the fight for free movement, this is what the Labour Party and the whole labour movement should be working towards. Politically, the only way forward to achieve a more open, fair system is to question the whole apparatus of immigration control - from immigration laws to their enforcement mechanisms to its natural conclusion, detention and deportation. As such, freedom of movement is an opportunity to build on and move forward. Giving up this fight would set us back enormously. The Labour Party, particularly one led by the left, should never do concede to this.

Sabrina Huck, Labour Party activist




Labour must rally in defence of migration

No-one who has been following British politics over the last few years can deny that public discourse around leaving the EU has been dominated by immigration. From the start of...


Ellie James

As a Labour activist, I only have to hear the words ‘General Election’ to start dusting off my waterproof and comfy trainers and mentally prepare to leaflet and door-knock for the foreseeable future. Growing up in the North-East, I’ve seen first-hand the benefits a Labour government can bring.

A Labour government changed my life and electing a phenomenal Labour MP and Labour councillors has done nothing but improve the city I now call home, Leeds. I will always campaign for future generations to receive the opportunities I have had as a result of a Labour government and to see an end to the Tory austerity that is destroying our communities.
As we have seen today, however, in the immediate future, a General Election that would make this possible is not going to happen. 118 Conservative MPs did not have confidence in Theresa’s May’s deal, yet they have propped up her failing government in the name of selfishness and self-preservation, not what is best for the people of this country. It is clear the Tories are unequipped and unable to deal with Brexit, and now a General Election is no longer an option. Parliament cannot agree on a deal.
We need to bring it back to the people.
There is now only one clear strategy for the Labour Party: to support a People’s Vote.
If the Labour Party gives the Tories a free reign with Brexit, they will continue to inflict suffering on the people of this country, particularly those who are already marginalised.
I campaign for a People’s Vote because I am a passionate Northerner, not in spite of the it, and I cannot sit on the side-lines and watch a disastrous Tory Brexit wreak havoc on the region that I love. The entire country will suffer, but many regions in the North and the North-East disproportionately so.
No one is saying they ‘know better’ than the millions of people - including the community I grew up in - that voiced their discontent with the status quo and voted leave.
We are saying that this government cannot be trusted to deliver a Brexit that represents what was promised to the people and that won’t damage our country for generations. We are saying that we cannot stand by and watch as the Tories plunge our country into isolation and ruin. We are saying that the voices of young people from the communities that will be greatly affected should, and will, be heard.
The Labour Party I joined fights for those who are suffering and the most vulnerable in our society. Letting the Tories stay at the driving wheel for Brexit will hurt those who need our help the most.
I am delighted to see more and more Labour MPs joining the fight for a People’s Vote, especially those who represent Northern constituencies. I hope to see more Labour MPs put their trust in their constituents and the leadership put their trust in the people.
We need to finally bring this Tory governments catastrophic handling of Brexit to an end. We need a People’s Vote.


Why I am campaigning for a People's Vote

  As a Labour activist, I only have to hear the words ‘General Election’ to start dusting off my waterproof and comfy trainers and mentally prepare to leaflet and door-knock...

All too often we are met with the cries of a ‘capitalist plot’ when defending the European Union to our Labour colleagues, as 'neocon' and 'neoliberal' are added in for effect. Indeed, with its focuses on intergovernmental trade it could be seen as 'capitalist' but to label it as some sort of capitalist conspiracy is dangerous at best.


The European Union is a project, one that at its foundation set out to further European integration and set out an equal standing of rights for all its citizens. The ways in which the EU strives for social justice in all member states are numerous.

Even the Single Market, derided for its focus on trade and the capitalist inferences that entails, has created a more balanced society by removing barriers and creating a level playing field that benefits the worker just as much as the employer. Socialism by definition is the belief in equality and through removal of physical and fiscal barriers the European Union answers that.

The budget of the European Union itself contains measures to ensure equality. Brexiteers are all too keen to tell us of how much we pay into the EU; but much of this capital is redistributed throughout member states fairly. Is redistribution not also key to the principles of socialism?

Finally, there are the extensive social benefits that have been given to citizens through membership of the European Union. Rights for workers, women, the young and the disabled are just a few of those protected by the EU. The creation of the working week is something that all socialists can agree is a good thing and the protection of maternity rights is something that must be protected at all costs; a protection that the European Union provides. The EU has seen great success in protecting against discrimination. Without it as an overarching governing body, countries would be free to stray far from the path of fairness, and so commences the race to the bottom. 

OECD research shows that not only has the European Union led in terms of social justice and inequality, but that the United Kingdom lags behind its European neighbours in these fields before Brexit even happens; we are yet to see the true effect that Tory policy will have on a post-Brexit Britain, but the start from which we begin this isolationist journey is hardly encouraging.


Without membership of the European Union, there is no limit to what our current government could do that would lead us further into the depths of inequality. The Conservatives simply cannot be trusted to maintain the high standards of social justice that is regulated by the European Union.


Abby King is a member of LME, and a BA European Studies (German) student at Royal Holloway, University of London.

Brexit Short- Against Lexit

All too often we are met with the cries of a ‘capitalist plot’ when defending the European Union to our Labour colleagues, as 'neocon' and 'neoliberal' are added in for...

See More >

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.